Export limit exceeded: 386826 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (386826 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-51764 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect access control in the recvSlaveCloudCheckStatus function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to overwrite cloud-result tracking files via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51769 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect access control in the remoteCloudUpdateCheck function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to restart the cloud update check workflow via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51770 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect access control in the sendToMasterQosConfig function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to forward attacker-controlled QoS settings to the master via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component.. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51974 | 1 Lllyasviel | 1 Fooocus | 2026-09-03 | 8.8 High |
| An eval() injection vulnerability in the get_list function in modules/meta_parser.py in lllyasviel Fooocus 2.1.854 through 2.5.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via a crafted styles payload in the EXIF metadata of an uploaded image file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73778 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Aos-cx | 2026-09-03 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability exists in the Credential Manager component that may allow for unauthorized administrative access. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability on a device in its factory-default or post-ZTP state before any administrator has configured credentials by providing a predictable factory-default password. Successful exploitation could result in full administrative control of the affected device during the initial setup process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83549 | 1 Sonicwall | 6 Sma1000, Sma6210, Sma6210 Firmware and 3 more | 2026-09-03 | 7.8 High |
| Post-authentication Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Management Console (AMC) which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker as administrator to execute arbitrary OS commands, resulting in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78000 | 1 J2commerce.com | 1 J2store Extension For Joomla | 2026-09-03 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Reflected XSS via `filter_tag`, `pricefrom` and `priceto` in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - Four task handlers accepted a base64-encoded URL from user input and redirected to it without validating the destination host, enabling phishing using the shop's trusted domain. No authentication required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8709 | 2 Progress, Progress Software Corporation | 2 Marklogic Server, Marklogic Server | 2026-09-03 | 9.9 Critical |
| An improper privilege management vulnerability in the REST API document patch operation of Progress MarkLogic Server before 11.3.6 and 12.0.3 allows an authenticated user with a low-privileged REST role to escalate privileges and execute privileged operations against the Security database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78064 | 1 J2commerce.com | 1 J2store Extension For Joomla | 2026-09-03 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Anonymous cart-record tampering via inherited FOF `save` task in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - `fof.xml` grants the `carts` view's tasks a wildcard `true` ACL, and FOF only enforces CSRF tokens on back-end HTML requests, not on front-end `format=raw` requests. `J2StoreControllerCarts` already scoped `remove()` to the caller's own session, but never overrode the generic FOF `save` task, so it remained reachable to insert new cart rows with an attacker-chosen `user_id`/`session_id`, or overwrite an existing row by id. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77999 | 1 J2commerce.com | 1 J2store Extension For Joomla | 2026-09-03 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Unauthenticated PayPal callback forgery leading to order confirmation fraud in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - The PayPal IPN listener's signature check (`_validateIPN()`) accepted `UNVERIFIED` and any non-`INVALID` response as valid, made its verification request with `CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER` disabled, and stored its verdict in a field nothing downstream ever checked — so processing continued regardless of the outcome. Separately, the paid-amount comparison only ran when `mc_gross` was a positive number; omitting the field from the POST body (`floatval(null) == 0`) skipped the check entirely. Combined with a merchant-configured `receiver_email` and a sequential, enumerable order id read from the `custom` field, an anonymous POST was enough to move a pending order straight to `CONFIRMED` with no payment, or force another customer's pending order to `FAILED`. `paypalv2.php` performed no amount check under any circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78065 | 1 J2commerce.com | 1 J2store Extension For Joomla | 2026-09-03 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Guest checkout address disclosure to any authenticated user (IDOR) in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - `editAddress()` redirected non-owners away only when the loaded address row had a **non-empty** `user_id` belonging to someone else. Guest-checkout address rows have an empty `user_id`, so that check never triggered for them — any logged-in account guessing a small, sequential `address_id` got a guest customer's full name, street address, and phone number rendered prefilled into the edit form. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78069 | 1 J2commerce.com | 1 J2store Extension For Joomla | 2026-09-03 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Missing authorization on Apps controller delegation chain in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - `J2StoreControllerApps`'s `appTask` delegation path instantiates app-plugin controllers with no ACL check anywhere in the code. It currently returns 403 only as a side effect of `fof.xml`'s wildcard-deny resolving under the singularised ACL key `app`, which has no explicit allow rule — not because of any deliberate check. Behind that path, `applocalizationdata::getInstallerTool()` used a caller-influenced table name with no allow-list, both to select a `#__j2store_*` table for truncation and to build a path to SQL files it then executes — a path-traversal-capable file read/execute. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78586 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user with low-level privileges could submit a specially crafted request that causes Kibana to consume an unbounded amount of memory, rendering it unavailable to all users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78590 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-03 | 7.3 High |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (CWE-22) in the Kibana Fleet feature can lead to the unauthorized deletion of privileged resources via Path Traversal (CAPEC-126). A low-privileged user holding Fleet Settings write access could cause a subsequent administrative action to act on unintended internal resources, resulting in the deletion of privileged resources such as user accounts and other organizational assets. Exploitation requires an administrator to interact with the affected Fleet interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78591 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-03 | 6.3 Medium |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (CWE-22) in the Kibana Fleet feature can lead to the unauthorized deletion of resources via Path Traversal (CAPEC-126). A low-privileged user could cause a subsequent action taken by a higher-privileged user in the Fleet administration interface to act on an unintended target, resulting in the deletion of resources including accounts with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78599 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (CWE-22) in the Kibana Fleet feature can lead to the unauthorized deletion of internal resources via Path Traversal (CAPEC-126). A low-privileged user holding Fleet write access could cause a subsequent administrative delete action to act on unintended internal resources. Exploitation requires an administrator to interact with the affected Fleet interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78601 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). An authorization control was not applied to a Kibana Entity Store configuration operation, allowing an authenticated user with elevated Kibana privileges to indirectly cause a background task to read from Elasticsearch indices that user is not authorized to access. Derived entity data from those indices is then exposed through the entity store output. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78598 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in the Kibana machine learning feature can lead to information disclosure via Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (CAPEC-180). An authenticated user holding machine learning job management privileges within a single Kibana space could cause a job's saved object to become accessible across all spaces in the Kibana instance, without holding access rights to those additional spaces. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78584 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| Observable Response Discrepancy (CWE-204) in the Kibana Osquery feature can lead to information disclosure via Query System for Information (CAPEC-54). An authenticated user holding Osquery live-query privileges could determine whether a scheduled query identifier exists in a Kibana space they are not authorized to access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9190 | 2 Progress, Progress Software Corporation | 2 Marklogic Server, Marklogic Server | 2026-09-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| An HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in the HTTP App Server of Progress MarkLogic Server before 11.3.6 and 12.0.3 allows a remote attacker to bypass authentication and authorization checks, hijack a legitimate user's session, or capture credentials. The vulnerability occurs when a crafted HTTP request containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers causes a reverse proxy and MarkLogic Server to interpret request boundaries differently. | ||||