Export limit exceeded: 421030 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (421030 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-79699 | 1 Redhat | 7 Ansible Automation Platform, Container Native Virtualization, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2026-11-06 | 4.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the containers/storage library. A crafted tar archive containing a malicious whiteout header (e.g. victim/.wh.) can cause the extraction destination directory to be replaced with an arbitrary file when processed by storage/pkg/archive.UnpackLayer, ApplyLayer, or ApplyUncompressedLayer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68744 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Sssd | 6 Sssd, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 3 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.3 Low |
| A flaw was found in SSSD. The sss_nss_protocol_fill_initgr() function in the NSS responder pre-allocates reply space for all group entries but does not shrink the packet when groups are skipped, causing uninitialized heap bytes to be transmitted to the client. A local attacker can exploit this to disclose cached directory data and heap layout information from the sssd_nss process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6842 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 2.5 Low |
| A flaw was found in nano. In environments with permissive umask settings, a local attacker can exploit incorrect directory permissions (0777 instead of 0700) for the `~/.local` directory. This allows the attacker to inject a malicious `.desktop` launcher, which could lead to unintended actions or information disclosure if the launcher is subsequently processed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119217 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22573 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortisoar, Fortisoar On-premise, Fortisoaron-premise and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 6.2 Medium |
| An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform path traversal attack via File Content Extraction actions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26083 | 1 Fortinet | 5 Fortisandbox, Fortisandbox Cloud, Fortisandbox Paas and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | 9.1 Critical |
| A missing authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.1, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.0 through 5.0.1, FortiSandbox Cloud 4.4.5 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox PaaS 23.4 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 23.3 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 23.1 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 22.2 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 22.1 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 21.4 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 21.3 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.0 through 5.0.1, FortiSandbox PaaS 4.4.5 through 4.4.8 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70466 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiweb | 2026-11-06 | 4.8 Medium |
| A incomplete list of disallowed inputs vulnerability [CWE-184] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via specifically crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87768 | 1 Perl | 1 Datetime::lite | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| DateTime::Lite versions before 0.8.1 for Perl allow CPU exhaustion via a per-day loop when adding seconds. _normalize_leap_seconds crosses day boundaries one day at a time, so add(seconds => $n) on an object with a non-floating time zone takes about |$n|/86400 iterations, and nothing limits $n. The XS implementation and the pure-Perl fallback both have the loop. An attacker who controls the number of seconds added can keep the process busy for as long as they choose. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118395 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| Gitea 1.27.3 stopped personal access tokens restricted to public resources (`public-only`) from creating repositories through `POST /api/v1/user/repos` and `POST /api/v1/repos/migrate`, but `POST /api/v1/org/{org}/repos`, `POST /api/v1/orgs/{org}/repos`, `POST /api/v1/orgs` and `POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/generate` still accepted such tokens. A holder of a public-only token with the needed write scopes could create private repositories in organizations where the token's owner may create repositories, create private organizations, and generate private repositories from templates. The token still could not read the private repositories it created. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118504 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The web interface blocks issue and pull request changes on archived repositories, but several issue routes of the REST API did not check whether the repository is archived. A user allowed to change issues of an archived repository could use the API to edit, close or delete issues, change labels and deadlines, add or delete tracked time and stopwatches, add reactions, change issue blocks, and pin issues, altering data that archiving is meant to freeze. Gitea 28.2.0 added the check to the issue edit, delete and label routes; Gitea 28.3.0 applies it to all modifying repository API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58963 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58976 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 4 Medium |
| In getSelectionBySubIds of ProviderUtil.java, there is a possible cross-user data leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58997 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 4 Medium |
| In validateImageInfo of Bitmap.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a precondition check failure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59011 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 4 Medium |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2511 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 2 more | 102 Debian Linux, 500f, 500f Firmware and 99 more | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| Issue summary: Some non-default TLS server configurations can cause unbounded memory growth when processing TLSv1.3 sessions Impact summary: An attacker may exploit certain server configurations to trigger unbounded memory growth that would lead to a Denial of Service This problem can occur in TLSv1.3 if the non-default SSL_OP_NO_TICKET option is being used (but not if early_data support is also configured and the default anti-replay protection is in use). In this case, under certain conditions, the session cache can get into an incorrect state and it will fail to flush properly as it fills. The session cache will continue to grow in an unbounded manner. A malicious client could deliberately create the scenario for this failure to force a Denial of Service. It may also happen by accident in normal operation. This issue only affects TLS servers supporting TLSv1.3. It does not affect TLS clients. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is also not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59849 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 12 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux For Els and 9 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in libssh. Logic errors in automatic certificate-based public key authentication can cause libssh clients to loop indefinitely when configured certificates are missing or repeatedly rejected by a server, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59842 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 12 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux For Els and 9 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in libssh. During server-side GSSAPI key exchange, a client-supplied Curve25519 public key shorter than the expected length is copied without proper length validation, leading to an out-of-bounds heap read. This could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to disclose small amounts of server memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66338 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 4 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109683 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| A newline injection vulnerability exists in the UPnP service of Archer BE805 v1 such that an adjacent attacker can supply newline characters in a UPnP port-mapping description due to improper sanitization, resulting in possible injection of unintended content into UPnP port-mapping data. Successful exploitation may allow an unauthenticated attacker on the local network to modify runtime UPnP port-mapping information and create spoofed entries within the affected service. The issue is limited to the integrity of UPnP mapping data and does not demonstrate code execution or privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120484 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-119167 Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-119167. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-119167 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | ||||