Export limit exceeded: 107557 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (107557 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-114489 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 8.1 High |
| Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to change mail routing and domain configuration beyond those domains on a multi-tenant server. A domain administrator, an account or API key given another role that manages accounts in named domains, or a full-scope API key issued for named domains could create a domain alias for any name (so that other tenants' mail for that name is diverted to an address the attacker controls, or denied), rename a domain to any name the server does not host, set a rule's bind-to-address, send-using-route or script-function action to reach one of the server's own addresses, a configured route's stored credentials or a function of the server's event script, and set the domain's relay host - which delivery then connects to with no address rule - to an address on the server's own network; and over the COM API any account could set the three rule actions on its own rules, where the script-function action runs at delivery. The authorization gate did not refuse these routes to a confined credential and the handlers were not given the caller; over COM the domain-alias save performed no authorization check at all, the domain rename required only a domain administrator, and a rule save required at most that the caller could change the rule's owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114476 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect authorization in the REST administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential holds the manage_roles permission in named domains - a full-scope API key issued for those domains, or an account assigned the serveradmin role with a list of domains - to obtain the server administrator's authority. An account's admin level gives it authority, and a role assigned to it replaces that authority, which is how an administrator narrows an account whose admin level is the server administrator's. The route that takes a role away (DELETE /api/v1/role-assignments/{address}) checked only that the credential takes in what the account held at the time, not what it would hold afterwards, so such a credential could take a narrowing role away from an account in its domains whose admin level is the server administrator's, returning it to the server administrator's authority, and, having set that account's password while it held the narrower role, sign in as the server administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102486 | 1 Ntpsec | 1 Ntpsec | 2026-10-29 | 7.5 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in NTS extension field parsing in NTPsec ntpd 1.1.4 through 1.2.5 allows a remote attacker to crash the daemon via an NTS Authenticator and Encrypted Extension Fields (AEEF) field with an oversized nonce length. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102483 | 1 Ntpsec | 1 Ntpsec | 2026-10-29 | 7.5 High |
| Reachable exit in NTPsec ntpd 1.1.4 through 1.2.5 allows a remote attacker to terminate the daemon via an NTS request with excess NTS Cookie Placeholder extension fields. | ||||
| CVE-2016-20084 | 3 Codepeople, Dwbooster, Wordpress | 3 Appointment Booking Calendar, Booking Calendar Contact, Wordpress | 2026-10-29 | 7.2 High |
| WordPress appointment-booking-calendar 1.1.24 contains multiple privilege escalation vulnerabilities that allow unauthenticated attackers to modify calendar settings and inject persistent cross-site scripting payloads through the admin.php page parameters. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into the 'ict' and 'ics' options or the calendar 'name' parameter via GET requests to execute arbitrary scripts when the calendar is displayed or accessed in the administration interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101567 | 1 Oracle | 1 Cost Management | 2026-10-29 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Cost Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Cost Planning). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Cost Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Cost Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-91217 | 1 Oracle | 1 Soa Suite | 2026-10-29 | 8.6 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle SOA Suite product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Fabric Layer). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle SOA Suite. While the vulnerability is in Oracle SOA Suite, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle SOA Suite accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.6 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-76418 | 1 Cisco | 3 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (ftd) Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-10-29 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to logic errors when secondary authentication is configured on a tunnel group. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request when connecting to the SSL remote access VPN. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85899 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge Chromium, Microsoft Edge (chromium-based) | 2026-10-29 | 8.1 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96187 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge Chromium, Microsoft Edge (chromium-based) | 2026-10-29 | 7.4 High |
| Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88077 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge Chromium, Microsoft Edge (chromium-based) | 2026-10-29 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98976 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-10-29 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namespace: keep the lock on a mount that a propagated copy is moved beneath attach_recursive_mnt() transfers MNT_LOCKED from the top mount to the mount that is moved beneath it with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. This allows the owner of a user namespace to replace its locked /proc or its root. The mount beneath takes on the job of covering the underlying mountpoint allowing the top mount to be unmounted. Consider two mount namespaces: (H) The host H has a shared mount P with a secret in P/d (Z) Z is a user namespace made from M. Its copy of P receives propagation from the host's P and its copy of M's cover on P/d is locked Z's owner must not get to see P/d. Now (H) mounts X on P/d. This propagates into (Z). The copy of X lands beneath (Z)'s locked cover. The locked property is transfered from (Z)'s cover to the copy of X propagated beneath it. The cover is now unlocked. Now (H) unmounts X again. The copy of X in (Z) gets unmounted and the covering mount is left unlocked on top of P/d. (Z) can now unmount it: Z: umount2(P/d) = EINVAL /* the cover is locked */ H: mount X on P/d, umount X /* both propagate into Z /* Z: umount2(P/d) = 0 /* the cover is now unlocked */ Z: read P/d/secret = "covered-by-root" /* secret revealed */ So only transfer the locked property to the mount beneath for mounts the caller has placed. A propagated copy that lands beneath a locked mount is locked as well so that the mount at the bottom of the stack carries a lock the way every check expects. The mount on top of it remains locked to ensure that it keeps covering even if the propagated mount is unmounted again. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84294 | 2 Progress, Progress Software | 2 Ws Ftp Server, Ws Ftp Server | 2026-10-29 | 7.7 High |
| Improper limitation of pathname in the Ad Hoc Transfer component of Progress Software WS_FTP Server versions prior to 2024.0.6 and 2025.0.3 on Windows could allow an authenticated user to access files outside intended directories. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69966 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-29 | 7.8 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Streaming Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70198 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 17 more | 2026-10-29 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Push Notifications allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83666 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2012 and 11 more | 2026-10-29 | 7 High |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83670 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-29 | 7.5 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83674 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2016 and 6 more | 2026-10-29 | 8.1 High |
| Weak authentication in Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83688 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-29 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83694 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-29 | 7 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Volume Manager Extension Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||