Export limit exceeded: 389946 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389946 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8862 | 1 Ibm | 2 Netezza Performance Server, Netezza Software | 2026-09-10 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Netezza Software 11.3.0.3 through Interim Fix 002 has credentials that are hardcoded in the application source code, allowing unauthorized access to the container registry. The exposed secret enables attackers to pull private container images, potentially revealing proprietary code, configuration details, and other sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41871 | 1 Apache | 1 Nutch | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Missing Authorization, Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in Apache Nutch Server (Nutch REST API). This issue affects Apache Nutch: from 1.10 through 1.22. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.23, which removes the Nutch Server. If an upgrade is not possible, user must restrict access to instances running the Nutch Service to trusted users only. Please, also visit the Apache Nutch security advisories https://nutch.apache.org/documentation/security/ . | ||||
| CVE-2026-54048 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2026-09-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| Specifying tblproperties('avro.schema.url'=' http://...' ) or with a 'file:///' URI on a table in Impala 2.0.0 to 4.5.1 on all platforms allows an attacker to trigger a GET request to internal endpoints they may not have access to but that Impala does and the response my be exposed via parsing error messages. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.5.2, which fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9036 | 1 Ibm | 2 Netezza Performance Server, Netezza Software | 2026-09-10 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Netezza Software 11.3.0.3 through Interim Fix 002 does not validate or improperly validates TLS certificate validation, which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56207 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2026-09-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Signature of Bearer token is not verified in last step of SAML2 authentication for Impala's hs2-http interface, allowing altering user name and acting as another user. This issue affects Apache Impala: >=4.0.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.5.2, which fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45752 | 2026-09-10 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Starting in version 8.0.0 and prior to version 8.0.5, when certain detection transforms are chained, the decompress transform pipeline could read from an inspection buffer after it had been reallocated and freed. The issue is reached during network traffic processing, but requires a malicious rule as Suricata will crash whatever the traffic. Version 8.0.5 contains a fix. As a workaround, avoid rules that chain `gunzip` or `zlib_deflate` with `max-size` bigger than 4096 after another transform. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79592 | 2026-09-10 | N/A | ||
| An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the xls_dumpSummary() function of libxls 1.6.3 due to insufficient validation of file-controlled OLE summary offsets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57866 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2026-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| Server side request forgery in Apache Impala versions 4.4.x and 4.5.x. Authenticated Impala users with permissions to execute the ai_generate_text() function can exfiltrate secrets provided by the credential providers configured in the `hadoop.security.credential.provider.path` property of `core-site.xml`. The secret's key must be known to the user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65181 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2026-09-10 | 8.1 High |
| Insufficient authorization of Data Source tables in Impala 2.7-4.5 allows a client with privileges to upload a file to remote storage and create a table to execute arbitrary Java code. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.5.2, which fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9736 | 1 Ibm | 2 Netezza Performance Server, Netezza Software | 2026-09-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Netezza Software 11.3.0.3 through Interim Fix 002 could allow an unauthorized user to inject data into log messages due to improper neutralization of special elements when written to log files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9744 | 1 Ibm | 2 Netezza Performance Server, Netezza Software | 2026-09-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Netezza Software 11.3.0.3 through Interim Fix 002 does not validate or improperly validates TLS certificate validation, which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89089 | 2026-09-10 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the JasperReports-based reporting feature of multiple versions of OpenNMS Meridian and Horizon. A low-privileged authenticated user (ROLE_USER) can run the shipped, default-enabled online reports "Maintenance contracts expired" (AssetManagementMaintExpired) and "Maintenance contracts strategy" (AssetManagementMaintStrategy) via the reporting REST API (POST /rest/reports/{id}) and supply a DATE_FORMAT parameter that the report templates substitute literally, un-escaped, into their SQL queries. This lets an attacker execute arbitrary SQL against the OpenNMS database and read arbitrary data, including database-stored secrets such as provisioning and notification credentials and SNMP community strings. The solution is to upgrade to Meridian 2024.3.13, 2025.0.10 and Horizon 36.0.4 or newer. Meridian and Horizon installation instructions state that they are intended for installation within an organization's private networks and should not be directly accessible from the Internet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28630 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In onCreate of ContactsPickerActivity.kt, there is a possible misleading UI due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28633 | 2026-09-10 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| In initForUserNoTracing of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28638 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In multiple functions of XmpDataParser.java, there is a possible improper data sanitization due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28642 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High |
| In executeRequest of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28653 | 2026-09-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| In multiple functions of rw_t3t.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28660 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In getAllSessions of multiple files, there is a possible confused deputy due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45521 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In openFile of AppFuseBridge.java, there is a possible information disclosure due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55290 | 2026-09-10 | 3.3 Low | ||
| In setTo of ResourceTypes.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds heap read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||