Export limit exceeded: 425801 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425801 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (425801 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-97692 | 1 Bacnetstack | 1 Bacnet Stack | 2026-11-13 | 7.7 High |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.6, 1.5.2, and 1.6.1, the BACnet/SC message decoder walks the header-option list by following each option's MORE bit. Nothing rejects a list whose last option still has the MORE bit set, and the decode walk has no upper bound on how many options it processes. A single crafted BVLC-SC frame makes the walk advance one option past the end of the message and read message[message_len], one byte out of bounds. When the bytes after the message carry more MORE-set option markers, the walk keeps going: it runs past the fixed 4-entry option array and writes decoded option fields out of bounds. On the server that decode array is the static global bsc_dm, so the out-of-bounds write lands in adjacent BSS. Both faults are reachable before authentication, from the first frame a peer sends on a BACnet/SC connection, and the bytes that follow the message are the same peer's prior-frame data. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.6, 1.5.2, 1.6.1, and 1.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102612 | 1 Bacnetstack | 1 Bacnet Stack | 2026-11-13 | 8.1 High |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.6, 1.5.2, and 1.6.1, bws_srv_start() in ports/linux/websocket-srv.c builds the libwebsockets server context with a CA certificate loaded but never sets LWS_SERVER_OPTION_REQUIRE_VALID_OPENSSL_CLIENT_CERT, so the hub accepts TLS connections from clients presenting no certificate at all. Any network-reachable host can join the BACnet/SC mesh without credentials. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.6, 1.5.2, 1.6.1, and 1.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104204 | 1 Bacnetstack | 1 Bacnet Stack | 2026-11-13 | N/A |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to version 1.6.1, there is a server-side denial-of-service issue affecting the Structured View object implementation. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.1 and 1.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110178 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 4.1 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.11 is vulnerable to improper access control in the bulk import path. A remote authenticated attacker holding a team-scoped `admin.import` permission can overwrite the endpoint URL, request headers, and authentication credentials of public tools, resources, and prompts owned by other tenants by sending a crafted POST request to `/v1/import` with `conflict_strategy=update`, redirecting subsequent AI gateway invocations to an attacker-controlled host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110199 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 4.8 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.11 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110279 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 8.1 High |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 is vulnerable to improper credential handling because the X-Upstream-Authorization request header can override the gateway-managed upstream credential for OAuth (authorization_code and client_credentials), bearer and basic authenticated gateways, which could allow an authenticated user to cause upstream requests to be made with a different credential and bypass per-user permission and audit attribution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94407 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.11 is potentially vulnerable to denial of service due to uncontrolled regular expression complexity (CWE-400 / ReDoS). An authenticated user with tool-registration privileges can embed catastrophically backtracking regex patterns in a tool's JSON Schema `pattern` field; when ContextForge validates arguments against that schema, the validation call may consume unbounded CPU, potentially degrading gateway availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110189 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.8 through 1.0.11, and v1.1.0 is vulnerable to denial of service due to an incomplete denylist in the jq filter guard module (CWE-184). An authenticated remote attacker can supply a crafted `jsonpath_filter` value containing `halt`, `halt_error`, or unbounded-loop built-ins that bypass the safety check, causing gateway worker process termination or sustained resource exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110195 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.11 could allow an authenticated caller to bypass upstream credential-level authorization policies due to an insufficiently specific cache key in the RFC 8693 token exchange cache, enabling reuse of cached upstream bearer tokens across different credentials belonging to the same user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110278 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 7.4 High |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow an attacker to replay identity propagation claims signatures or expose sensitive user identity information to third-party MCP servers due to static signature payloads and missing per-gateway configuration checks during tool invocation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-128886 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-11-13 | 6.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in dbus when configured with the nonce-tcp transport. An unauthenticated attacker able to connect to an exposed listener can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by opening a connection and withholding the expected authentication token. Because the server processes this verification without enforcing a timeout, the stalled connection blocks the accept process and prevents legitimate clients from establishing new connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97683 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 2.5 Low |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow a local attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a missing or misconfigured security context. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9870 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108290 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 4 Medium |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow an attacker with local access to a container to extract sensitive information due to unrestrictive network policies. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9821 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow an unauthorized user to inject data into log messages due to improper neutralization of special elements when written to log files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57013 | 2026-11-13 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In access_control_enable of multiple files, there is a possible way to release secure coprocessors from reset via unclaimed firewall registers due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58702 | 2026-11-13 | 4.0 Medium | ||
| In createIntent of TimerAgent.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58705 | 2026-11-13 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| In handleEvent of gscan.cpp, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write on the heap due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58757 | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High | ||
| In mfc_alloc_enc_roi_buffer of mfc_buf.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58762 | 2026-11-13 | 2.3 Low | ||
| In ac_get_prot_config of plat_trusty.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||