| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in SolverWp Portfolio Builder swp-portfolio allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Portfolio Builder: from n/a through <= 1.2.5. |
| Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in Edge-Themes Belletrist belletrist allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Belletrist: from n/a through <= 1.2. |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface. By using an encoded URL, a remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially cause the appliance to make requests to unintended location. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in AES Multimedia's Gestnet v1.07. This vulnerability allows an attacker to retrieve, create, update and delete databases via the ‘fk_remoto_central’ parameter on the ‘/webservices/articles.php’ endpoint. |
| Hidden functionality issue exists in WRC-BE36QS-B and WRC-W701-B. If exploited, the product's hidden debug function may be enabled by a remote attacker who can log in to WebGUI. |
| Due to missing input sanitation, SAP Solution Manager allows an authenticated attacker to insert malicious code when calling a remote-enabled function module. This could provide the attacker with full control of the system hence leading to high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the system. |
| Due to insufficient validation of connection property values, the SAP HANA JDBC Client allows a high-privilege locally authenticated user to supply crafted parameters that lead to unauthorized code loading, resulting in low impact on confidentiality and integrity and high impact on availability of the application. |
| SAP Application Server for ABAP allows an authenticated attacker to store malicious JavaScript payloads which could be executed in victim user's browser when accessing the affected functionality of BAPI explorer. This has low impact on confidentiality and integrity with no impact on availability of the application. |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Inetum IODAS 7.2-LTS.4.1-JDK7/7.2-RC3.2-JDK7. Affected is an unknown function of the file /astre/iodasweb/app.jsp. The manipulation of the argument action leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| An XML external entities (XXE) injection vulnerability in the /init API endpoint in Exagid EX10 before 6.4.0 P20, 7.0.1 P12, and 7.2.0 P08 allows an authenticated, unprivileged attacker to achieve information disclosure and privilege escalation via a crafted ISys XML message. |
| The OZI action is a GitHub Action that publishes releases to PyPI and mirror releases, signature bundles, and provenance in a tagged release. In versions 1.13.2 through 1.13.5, potentially untrusted data flows into PR creation logic. A malicious actor could construct a branch name that injects arbitrary code. This is patched in 1.13.6. As a workaround, one may downgrade to a version prior to 1.13.2. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in JGM Pandoc v3.6.4 allows attackers to gain access to and compromise the whole infrastructure via injecting a crafted iframe. Note: Some users have stated that Pandoc by default can retrieve and parse untrusted HTML content which can enable SSRF vulnerabilities. Using the ‘--sandbox’ option or ‘pandoc-server’ can mitigate such vulnerabilities. Using pandoc with an external ‘--pdf-engine’ can also enable SSRF vulnerabilities, such as CVE-2022-35583 in wkhtmltopdf. |
| Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability in local API server of DestinyECM solution(versions described below) which is developed and maintained by Cyberdigm may allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, which probabilistically enables JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) via forgery web page.* Due to product customization, version information may differ from the following version description. For further inquiries, please contact the vendor. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in StrangeBee TheHive 5.2.0 before 5.2.16, 5.3.0 before 5.3.11, 5.4.0 before 5.4.10, and 5.5.0 before 5.5.1 allows remote authenticated attackers with admin permissions (allowing them to access specific API endpoints) to manipulate URLs to direct requests to unexpected hosts or ports. This allows the attacker to use a TheHive server as a proxy to reach internal or otherwise restricted resources. This could be exploited to access other servers on the internal network. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5. |
| Server side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in makeplane plane 0.23.1 via the password recovery. |
| Multiple products provided by iND Co.,Ltd contain an insecure storage of sensitive information vulnerability. If exploited, configuration information, such as admin password, may be disclosed. As for the details of affected product names and versions, refer to the information under [Product Status]. |
| Island Lake WebBatch before 2025C allows Remote Code Execution via a crafted URL. |
| CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access to sensitive data when an attacker configures the application to access a malicious url. |
| A flaw has been found in ZhenShi Mibro Fit App 1.6.3.17499 on Android. This impacts an unknown function of the file AndroidManifest.xml of the component com.xiaoxun.xunoversea.mibrofit. This manipulation causes improper export of android application components. The attack requires local access. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
