| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The WPvivid — Backup, Migration & Staging WordPress plugin before 0.9.133 does not sanitise a user supplied list of identifiers before using it in a SQL query, allowing administrators to perform SQL injection attacks. |
| In Progress® Telerik® UI for AJAX prior to v2026.3.812, insufficient validation of client-supplied state in RadImageEditor may allow an attacker to influence which file is returned by the control's image cache, potentially exposing file contents outside the intended image directories. |
| In Progress® Telerik® UI for AJAX prior to v2026.3.812, insufficient integrity protection of dialog request parameters used by the RadEditor file browser may allow an attacker who has obtained certain application encryption key material to alter the folders the file browser reads from, writes to, and uploads into, potentially resulting in remote code execution. |
| SiYuan before v3.8.2 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in asset serving due to an incomplete extension blocklist that misses script-capable file types. Attackers can upload files with extensions like .xht, .ehtml, .xsl, .xbl, or .rdf that resolve to executable media types and execute JavaScript to steal API tokens and compromise workspaces. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in MP3 Audio Player for Music, Radio & Podcast by Sonaar <= 5.13.1 versions. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Entity Share Websub allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Entity Share Websub versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.2. |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, leading to complete compromise of the AFC host. |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against an administrative user of the interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim's browser in the context of the affected interface. |
| An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Fabric Composer and could be exploited if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, leading to complete compromise of the HPE Networking Fabric Composer host. |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to escalate their permissions to those of an administrative user, leading to complete system compromise. |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim's browser in the context of the affected interface. |
| A vulnerability in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain limited system information and to change the state of certain settings of a vulnerable system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain insight into internal services and workflows and to make unauthorized changes that may disrupt the normal operation of the affected service. |
| Privilege escalation vulnerabilities exist in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to complete state-changing actions that should not be allowed by their current level of authorization on the platform, including changes to the configuration of systems managed by the affected product. |
| A business logic vulnerability exists in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to obtain elevated privileges and modify settings beyond what is authorized by the user's existing privilege level on a vulnerable system. |
| A vulnerability in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. |
| Local privilege-escalation vulnerabilities have been discovered in HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow a local attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the underlying operating system of the affected system. |
| Insecure file operations in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated remote attacker to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. |
| Vulnerabilities in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against the HPE Networking Fabric Composer instance. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to obtain and modify sensitive information in the underlying database potentially leading to complete compromise of the HPE Networking Fabric Composer host. |
| Command injection vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform command injection against the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. |
| go-redis is the official Redis client library for the Go programming language. Prior to 9.5.5, 9.6.3, and 9.7.2, go-redis potentially responds out of order when `CLIENT SETINFO` times out during connection establishment. This can happen when the client is configured to transmit its identity, there are network connectivity issues, or the client was configured with aggressive timeouts. The problem occurs for multiple use cases. For sticky connections, you receive persistent out-of-order responses for the lifetime of the connection. All commands in the pipeline receive incorrect responses. When used with the default ConnPool once a connection is returned after use with ConnPool#Put the read buffer will be checked and the connection will be marked as bad due to the unread data. This means that at most one out-of-order response before the connection is discarded. This issue is fixed in 9.5.5, 9.6.3, and 9.7.2; however, 9.7.2 has been yanked and 9.7.3 is the lowest available patched version on the 9.7.x branch. As a workaround, set the flag `DisableIndentity` to `true` when constructing the client instance. |
