Export limit exceeded: 385677 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2719 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12174 | 1 Tenable | 1 Security Center | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low |
| An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center where an authenticated, privileged attacker could intercept email messages sent from Security Center via a rogue SMTP server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10125 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| The Amazon.ApplicationLoadBalancer.Identity.AspNetCore repo https://github.com/awslabs/aws-alb-identity-aspnetcore#validatetokensignature contains Middleware that can be used in conjunction with the Application Load Balancer (ALB) OpenId Connect integration and can be used in any ASP.NET https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/aspnet Core deployment scenario, including Fargate, EKS, ECS, EC2, and Lambda. In the JWT handling code, it performs signature validation but fails to validate the JWT issuer and signer identity. The signer omission, if combined with a scenario where the infrastructure owner allows internet traffic to the ALB targets (not a recommended configuration), can allow for JWT signing by an untrusted entity and an actor may be able to mimic valid OIDC-federated sessions to the ALB targets. The repository/package has been deprecated, is end of life, and is no longer supported. As a security best practice, ensure that your ELB targets (e.g. EC2 Instances, Fargate Tasks etc.) do not have public IP addresses. Ensure any forked or derivative code validate that the signer attribute in the JWT match the ARN of the Application Load Balancer that the service is configured to use. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49741 | 2 Wordpress, Wpdevart | 2 Wordpress, Coming Soon And Maintenance Mode | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in wpdevart Coming soon and Maintenance mode allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Coming soon and Maintenance mode: from n/a through 3.7.3. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49231 | 1 Stilog | 1 Visual Planning 8 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in Stilog Visual Planning 8. It allows an unauthenticated attacker to receive an administrative API token. | ||||
| CVE-2023-48753 | 2 10up, Wordpress | 2 Restricted Site Access, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in 10up Restricted Site Access allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Restricted Site Access: from n/a through 7.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47435 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in the verifyPassword function of hexo-theme-matery v2.0.0 allows attackers to bypass authentication and access password protected pages. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41134 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in pluginkollektiv Antispam Bee allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Antispam Bee: from n/a through 2.11.3. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40356 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| PingOne MFA Integration Kit contains a vulnerability related to the Prompt Users to Set Up MFA configuration. Under certain conditions, this configuration could allow for a new MFA device to be paired with a target user account without requiring second-factor authentication from the target’s existing registered devices. A threat actor might be able to exploit this vulnerability to register their own MFA device with a target user’s account if they have existing knowledge of the target user’s first factor credential. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20215 | 1 Cisco | 2 Webex, Webex Meetings | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the meeting-join functionality of Cisco Webex Meetings could have allowed an unauthenticated, network-proximate attacker to complete a meeting-join process in place of an intended targeted user, provided the requisite conditions were satisfied. Cisco has addressed this vulnerability in the Cisco Webex Meetings service, and no customer action is needed. This vulnerability existed due to client certificate validation issues. Prior to this vulnerability being addressed, an attacker could have exploited this vulnerability by monitoring local wireless or adjacent networks for client-join requests and attempting to interrupt and complete the meeting-join flow as another user who was currently joining a meeting. To successfully exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would need the capability to position themselves in a local wireless or adjacent network, to monitor and intercept the targeted network traffic flows, and to satisfy timing requirements in order to interrupt the meeting-join flow and exploit the vulnerability. A successful exploit could have allowed the attacker to join the meeting as another user. However, the Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) is not aware of any malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1887 | 1 Sage | 1 Sage 200 Spain | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| SMB forced authentication vulnerability in versions prior to 2025.35.000 of Sage 200 Spain. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to obtain NTLMv2-SSP Hash by changing any of the paths to a UNC path pointing to a server controlled by the attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15573 | 2 Solax, Solax Power | 5 Pocket Wifi 3, Pocket Wifi+4gm, Pocket Wifi+lan and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.4 Critical |
| The affected devices do not validate the server certificate when connecting to the SolaX Cloud MQTTS server hosted in the Alibaba Cloud (mqtt001.solaxcloud.com, TCP 8883). This allows attackers in a man-in-the-middle position to act as the legitimate MQTT server and issue arbitrary commands to devices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13953 | 1 Gtt | 1 Tax Information System | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Bypass vulnerability in the authentication method in the GTT Tax Information System application, related to the Active Directory (LDAP) login method. Authentication is performed through a local WebSocket, but the web application does not properly validate the authenticity or origin of the data received, allowing an attacker with access to the local machine or internal network to impersonate the legitimate WebSocket and inject manipulated information. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow an attacker to authenticate as any user in the domain, without the need for valid credentials, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application and its data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12790 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Rubygem MQTT. By default, the package used to not have hostname validation, resulting in possible Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12414 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Looker | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An attacker could take over a Looker account in a Looker instance configured with OIDC authentication, due to email address string normalization.Looker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable. This issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted. Self-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted. The versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ : * 24.12.100+ * 24.18.193+ * 25.0.69+ * 25.6.57+ * 25.8.39+ * 25.10.22+ * 25.12.0+ | ||||
| CVE-2025-11955 | 2 Microsoft, Thegreenbow | 6 Windows, Ipsec Vpn Client, Thegreenbow Vpn Client and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Incorrect validation of OCSP certificates vulnerability in TheGreenBow VPN, versions 7.5 and 7.6. During the IKEv2 authentication step, the OCSP-enabled VPN client establishes the tunnel even if it does not receive an OCSP response or if the OCSP response signature is invalid. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1146 | 1 Crowdstrike | 1 Falcon | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| CrowdStrike uses industry-standard TLS (transport layer security) to secure communications from the Falcon sensor to the CrowdStrike cloud. CrowdStrike has identified a validation logic error in the Falcon sensor for Linux, Falcon Kubernetes Admission Controller, and Falcon Container Sensor where our TLS connection routine to the CrowdStrike cloud can incorrectly process server certificate validation. This could allow an attacker with the ability to control network traffic to potentially conduct a man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack. CrowdStrike identified this issue internally and released a security fix in all Falcon sensor for Linux, Falcon Kubernetes Admission Controller, and Falcon Container Sensor versions 7.06 and above. CrowdStrike identified this issue through our longstanding, rigorous security review process, which has been continually strengthened with deeper source code analysis and ongoing program enhancements as part of our commitment to security resilience. CrowdStrike has no indication of any exploitation of this issue in the wild. CrowdStrike has leveraged its world class threat hunting and intelligence capabilities to actively monitor for signs of abuse or usage of this flaw and will continue to do so. Windows and Mac sensors are not affected by this. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4728 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Spoofing issue in the Privacy: Anti-Tracking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149 and Thunderbird 149. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33896 | 1 Digitalbazaar | 1 Forge | 2026-04-14 | 7.4 High |
| Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, `pki.verifyCertificateChain()` does not enforce RFC 5280 basicConstraints requirements when an intermediate certificate lacks both the `basicConstraints` and `keyUsage` extensions. This allows any leaf certificate (without these extensions) to act as a CA and sign other certificates, which node-forge will accept as valid. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32884 | 2 Botan Project, Randombit | 2 Botan, Botan | 2026-04-14 | 5.9 Medium |
| Botan is a C++ cryptography library. Prior to version 3.11.0, during processing of an X.509 certificate path using name constraints which restrict the set of allowable DNS names, if no subject alternative name is defined in the end-entity certificate Botan would check that the CN was allowed by the DNS name constraints, even though this check is technically not required by RFC 5280. However this check failed to account for the possibility of a mixed-case CN. Thus a certificate with CN=Sub.EVIL.COM and no subject alternative name would bypasses an excludedSubtrees constraint for evil.com because the comparison is case-sensitive. This issue has been patched in version 3.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3902 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2026-04-14 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. `ASGIRequest` allows a remote attacker to spoof headers by exploiting an ambiguous mapping of two header variants (with hyphens or with underscores) to a single version with underscores. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Tarek Nakkouch for reporting this issue. | ||||