Export limit exceeded: 389567 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10656 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-0759 | 2 Blaenkdenum, Wordpress | 2 Wp-recaptcha, Wordpress | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration page in the Recaptcha (aka WP-reCAPTCHA) plugin 2.9.8.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable the CAPTCHA requirement or insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) recaptcha_opt_pubkey, (2) recaptcha_opt_privkey, (3) re_tabindex, (4) error_blank, (5) error_incorrect, (6) mailhide_pub, (7) mailhide_priv, (8) mh_replace_link, or (9) mh_replace_title parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2011-3201 | 3 Gnome, Oracle, Redhat | 6 Evolution, Solaris, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| GNOME Evolution before 3.2.3 allows user-assisted remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the attachment parameter to a mailto: URL, which attaches the file to the email. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0760 | 2 Adminofsystem, Wordpress | 2 Wp Related Posts, Wordpress | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration screen in wp-relatedposts.php in the WP Related Posts plugin 1.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) wp_relatedposts_title, (2) wp_relatedposts_num, or (3) wp_relatedposts_type parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1104 | 1 Mutare | 1 Evm | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mutare EVM allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) change a PIN, (2) delete messages, (3) add a delivery address, or (4) change a delivery address. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1324 | 1 Buffalotech | 43 As-100, Bbr-4hg, Bbr-4hg Firmware and 40 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the management screen on Buffalo WHR, WZR2, WZR, WER, and BBR series routers with firmware 1.x; BHR-4RV and FS-G54 routers with firmware 2.x; and AS-100 routers allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify settings, as demonstrated by changing the login password. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1325 | 1 Lockon | 1 Ec-cube | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EC-CUBE before 2.11.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2011-2522 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shut down daemons, (2) start daemons, (3) add shares, (4) remove shares, (5) add printers, (6) remove printers, (7) add user accounts, or (8) remove user accounts, as demonstrated by certain start, stop, and restart parameters to the status program. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1341 | 1 Aimluck | 2 Aipo, Aipo-asp | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 4.0.4.0, and Aipo for ASP before 4.0.4.0, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify data. | ||||
| CVE-2011-2085 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Rt | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.12 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1954 | 1 Postrev | 1 Post Revolution | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Post Revolution 0.8.0c-2 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to (1) ajax-weblog-guardar.php, (2) verpost.php, (3) comments.php, or (4) perfil.php. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1364 | 1 Google | 1 App Engine Python Sdk | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in _ah/admin/interactive/execute (aka the Interactive Console) in the SDK Console (aka Admin Console) in the Google App Engine Python SDK before 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary Python code via the code parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1397 | 1 Ibm | 6 Maximo Asset Management, Maximo Asset Management Essentials, Maximo Service Desk and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Labor Reporting page in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1403 | 1 Mahara | 1 Mahara | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the pieforms implementation in Mahara before 1.3.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to any form, related to inappropriate regeneration of session keys. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1911 | 1 Jasperforge | 1 Jasperreports Server Community Project | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| JasperServer in JasperReports Server Community Project 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 uses a predictable _flowExecutionKey parameter, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a brute-force approach. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1905 | 1 Proofpoint | 2 Messaging Security Gateway, Protection Server | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in unspecified administrative modules in Proofpoint Messaging Security Gateway 6.2.0.263:6.2.0.237 and earlier in Proofpoint Protection Server 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 6.0.2, 6.1.1, and 6.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1545 | 1 Hp | 1 Insight Control Performance Management | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Performance Management before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1482 | 1 Phpnuke | 1 Php-nuke | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in mainfile.php in Francisco Burzi PHP-Nuke 8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts or (2) grant the administrative privilege to a user account, related to a Referer check that uses a substring comparison. | ||||
| CVE-2013-3963 | 1 Grandstream | 11 Gxv3500, Gxv3501, Gxv3504 and 8 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/usermanage in Grandstream GXV3501, GXV3504, GXV3601, GXV3601HD/LL, GXV3611HD/LL, GXV3615W/P, GXV3651FHD, GXV3662HD, GXV3615WP_HD, GXV3500, and possibly other camera models allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that add users. | ||||
| CVE-2013-5977 | 1 Cart66 | 1 Cart66 Lite Plugin | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cart66Product.php in the Cart66 Lite plugin before 1.5.1.15 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create or modify products or conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (2) Product name or (3) Price description field in a product save action via a request to wp-admin/admin.php. | ||||
| CVE-2013-5993 | 1 Lockon | 1 Ec-cube | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOCKON EC-CUBE 2.11.0 through 2.13.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unspecified vectors related to refusals. | ||||