Export limit exceeded: 417795 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 417795 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (46046 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-23705 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2026-10-29 | 6.5 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.13, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiManager 7.2 all versions may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31158 | 2026-10-29 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| SQL Injection vulnerability in CRM SOFTTRADE Infotech (aka softtradeindia) 1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Login Page | ||||
| CVE-2026-61654 | 1 Lightdash | 1 Lightdash | 2026-10-29 | N/A |
| Lightdash is an open source business intelligence platform. In affected versions through 0.3213.0, the dbt Cloud webhook `POST /api/v1/projects/{projectUuid}/dbt-cloud/webhook` has no authentication middleware or signature validation. In `packages/backend/src/controllers/projectController.ts`, `testWebhook()` accepts `accountId` and `runId` from a `job.run.completed` request and passes them to `createPreviewWithExplores()` in `packages/backend/src/services/ProjectService/ProjectService.ts`. These unsanitized values are interpolated into the server-side dbt Cloud API URL, which is requested with the victim project's API key in the `Authorization` header. Path traversal through `accountId` changes the requested path on `cloud.getdbt.com` without changing its host, so the credential-bearing request reaches an attacker-influenced path on that fixed host. The advisory claims API-key theft, but the supplied evidence does not establish that the attacker can observe the `Authorization` header. The unauthenticated webhook also allows preview creation. The target must be a `dbt Cloud IDE` project and the attacker must know its `projectUuid`; the UUID is not enumerable but can be discovered in shared or multi-tenant contexts. Version 0.3214.0 fixes identifier path traversal and verifies webhook HMAC signatures only when a secret is configured; without a secret, unsigned webhooks continue to be processed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112455 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 2 more | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, tvOS 27.2, visionOS 27.2, watchOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39736 | 2 Crocoblock, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Jetengine, Jetengine | 2026-10-29 | 8.5 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Crocoblock JetEngine jet-engine allows SQL Injection.This issue affects JetEngine: from n/a through 3.9.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110674 | 1 Rurban | 1 Cpanel::json::xs | 2026-10-29 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cpanel::JSON::XS versions from 4.33 before 4.80 for Perl miss duplicate non-ASCII bare keys, allowing type confusion under dupkeys_as_arrayref in decode_hv. With allow_barekey, which relaxed enables, a bare key containing a non-ASCII byte is stored as UTF-8 but looked up as raw bytes, so a repeated key escapes the duplicate-key check and replaces the earlier value. From 4.41, under dupkeys_as_arrayref, a bare repeat replaces the array that collects a key's values with a plain value, and the next quoted repeat pushes onto that value as if it were an array. A JSON integer there is dereferenced as a pointer. Untrusted JSON decoded with relaxed and dupkeys_as_arrayref can crash the process or dereference an address chosen by a JSON number. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119281 | 2 Mariadb, Mariadb-corporation | 2 Mariadb-connector-j, Mariadb-connector-j | 2026-10-29 | 5.9 Medium |
| MariaDB Connector/J is used to connect applications developed in Java to MariaDB and MySQL databases. From 3.0.0 until 3.3.7, 3.4.5, and 3.5.11, the connector assumed result bytes were UTF-8 but guarded only changes to character_set_client. It did not reject non-UTF-8 character_set_results changes and relied on the server's global session_track_system_variables configuration to report character-set changes. A malicious or compromised server, or a machine-in-the-middle attacker, could suppress tracking or change the result charset so application strings differed from the returned bytes, potentially defeating application-side validation or escaping that depended on the decoded values. This issue is fixed in versions 3.3.7, 3.4.5, and 3.5.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112609 | 1 Apple | 1 Ios And Ipados | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| This issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86925 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, visionOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48884 | 2 Wedevs, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp User Frontend, Wp User Frontend | 2026-10-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in weDevs WP User Frontend wp-user-frontend allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP User Frontend: from n/a through 4.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87352 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise Peopletools | 2026-10-29 | 4.4 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: LDAP). Supported versions that are affected are 8.61-8.63. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools executes to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-112685 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 2 more | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, tvOS 27.2, visionOS 27.2, watchOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72825 | 1 Getgrav | 2 Grav, Grav-plugin-api | 2026-10-29 | 7.6 High |
| The getgrav/grav-plugin-api plugin before 1.0.13 contains an API-key scope cap bypass in the POST /reports/twig-content/allowlist endpoint (ReportsController). The endpoint enforces requirePermission('api.config.write') followed by a bare isSuperAdmin() check instead of requireSuper(). Because isSuperAdmin() reads access.api.super directly and never consults api_key_scopes, a least-privilege API key scoped to api.config.write minted on a super account passes the gate, allowing an attacker to append attacker-chosen tokens to the security.twig_sandbox allowlist (persisted to user/config/security.yaml). Widening the allowlist turns any subsequent Twig-in-content render into an SSTI/RCE sink. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116211 | 1 Yeswiki | 1 Yeswiki | 2026-10-29 | 8.2 High |
| YesWiki 4.5.0 before 4.7.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in PageManager::save(), where the date_maj_fiche field of a Bazar entry-creation request is concatenated unescaped into an INSERT statement. Unauthenticated attackers on default installs can inject a sub-SELECT against wiki_users to exfiltrate password hashes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116112 | 1 Hashenudara | 1 Edoc-doctor-appointment-system | 2026-10-29 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in HashenUdara edoc-doctor-appointment-system up to cc258425b915d1af9e298777ccd26d160493e68d. The affected element is an unknown function of the file admin/add-new.php. The manipulation of the argument spec leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116061 | 1 Sourcecodester | 1 Performance Indicator System | 2026-10-29 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in SourceCodester Performance Indicator System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /opils/staff/edit_dealer.php. The manipulation of the argument Contact leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114490 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 7.8 High |
| Incorrect authorization in the COM administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows an account assigned the serveradmin role with a list of domains - a credential an administrator may create meaning to confine it to those domains - to act as the whole-server administrator over COM. Administrator roles are meant to confine such a credential to the domains its list names, and the REST API did not take it for the server administrator, but the COM API's server-administrator check read the administer_server permission as the whole server whatever list the grant carried. So the credential signed in through the Control Panel, or through a script run on the server, as the server administrator of every domain: it could read and change every domain's accounts and mail, rename any domain, map a domain alias onto any, write the server's settings and secrets, and create further server-administrator accounts. The COM API's domain-administrator check, asked with no domain, likewise let an account assigned the domainadmin role with a list of domains that leaves out the account's own domain administer that domain's ordinary accounts over COM. An account holding serveradmin with no list is the server administrator by design and is unaffected, as are the help desk, auditor and custom roles. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114489 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 8.1 High |
| Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to change mail routing and domain configuration beyond those domains on a multi-tenant server. A domain administrator, an account or API key given another role that manages accounts in named domains, or a full-scope API key issued for named domains could create a domain alias for any name (so that other tenants' mail for that name is diverted to an address the attacker controls, or denied), rename a domain to any name the server does not host, set a rule's bind-to-address, send-using-route or script-function action to reach one of the server's own addresses, a configured route's stored credentials or a function of the server's event script, and set the domain's relay host - which delivery then connects to with no address rule - to an address on the server's own network; and over the COM API any account could set the three rule actions on its own rules, where the script-function action runs at delivery. The authorization gate did not refuse these routes to a confined credential and the handlers were not given the caller; over COM the domain-alias save performed no authorization check at all, the domain rename required only a domain administrator, and a rule save required at most that the caller could change the rule's owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114477 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing authorization in the REST metrics route of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.25 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to read the server-wide traffic history. GET /api/v1/metrics/history returns the server's traffic counters over the last 30 days; those counters are server-wide and carry no domain, which is why the report routes already refuse the same counters to a credential confined to named domains. The metrics route was not among the routes the server's authorization gate refuses a confined credential and its handler was not given the caller, so a domain administrator, an account given another role that holds view_configuration in named domains (the auditor role given a domain list among them), or an API key issued for named domains could read the whole server's traffic totals rather than its own domains'. The disclosure is of aggregate operational counters, not of any message or account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114476 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect authorization in the REST administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential holds the manage_roles permission in named domains - a full-scope API key issued for those domains, or an account assigned the serveradmin role with a list of domains - to obtain the server administrator's authority. An account's admin level gives it authority, and a role assigned to it replaces that authority, which is how an administrator narrows an account whose admin level is the server administrator's. The route that takes a role away (DELETE /api/v1/role-assignments/{address}) checked only that the credential takes in what the account held at the time, not what it would hold afterwards, so such a credential could take a narrowing role away from an account in its domains whose admin level is the server administrator's, returning it to the server administrator's authority, and, having set that account's password while it held the narrower role, sign in as the server administrator. | ||||