Export limit exceeded: 387354 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 387354 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (387354 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-76962 | 2026-09-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP S/4HANA (Manage Bank Chains app) does not perform sufficient authorization checks within certain affected functionality. An attacker with low privileges could send specially crafted requests to delete specific entries that should not be accessible to them. This results in a low impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76961 | 2026-09-08 | 3.5 Low | ||
| SAP S/4HANA Finance (Advanced Payment Management) does not perform sufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery protection on certain requests, due to this an attacker with low privileges could craft a malicious link or page. If an authenticated victim interacts with it, unintended actions could be triggered on the web server on their behalf. This results in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76960 | 2026-09-08 | 3.5 Low | ||
| SAP S/4HANA Finance (Advanced Payment Management) does not perform sufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery protection on certain requests, due to this an attacker with low privileges could craft a malicious link or page. If an authenticated victim interacts with it, unintended actions could be triggered on the web server on their behalf. This results in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76959 | 2026-09-08 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| SAP S/4HANA Finance (Advanced Payment Management) does not perform sufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery protection on certain requests due to this an attacker with low privileges could craft a malicious link or page. If an authenticated victim interacts with it, unintended actions could be triggered on the web server on their behalf. This results in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76958 | 2026-09-08 | 8.5 High | ||
| SAP Integration Suite does not sufficiently validate XML documents accepted from untrusted sources in certain internal components. An attacker with low privileges could submit specially crafted XML payloads containing malicious external entity declarations. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive file contents from the server and expose them through monitoring or logging output, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality. It could also lead to resource exhaustion, causing a low impact on availability. There is no impact on integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66768 | 2026-09-08 | 9 Critical | ||
| SAP GUI for Java does not correctly enforce the trust level policy for certain functions invoked from a connected backend system. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this weakness by manipulating a connected backend system to trigger affected functionality. This could allow arbitrary command execution on the victim's machine, leading to a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66767 | 2026-09-08 | 7.7 High | ||
| SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an unauthenticated user to send a specially crafted packet that triggers reprocessing of a previously buffered user request, potentially hijacking another user's session under narrow timing conditions. Successful exploitation could result in high impact on confidentiality and integrity, with low impact on availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58240 | 2026-09-08 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| SAP NetWeaver Message Server does not sufficiently validate the authenticity of internal application server components during registration. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected service could exploit this weakness to register an unauthorized component and potentially perform unauthorized actions within the application environment, resulting in a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58234 | 2026-09-08 | 2.2 Low | ||
| SAP Process Integration (SOAP Adapter) allows a privileged user to send specially crafted requests containing deeply nested entity definitions, which under certain conditions could temporarily increase processor load and degrade system responsiveness. Successful exploitation results in low impact on availability with no impact on confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44766 | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| SAP S/4HANA (Intercompany Matching and Reconciliation) allows a low-privileged authenticated user to inject malicious input into certain functions, which may be processed by the database without proper validation. This could allow the user to access sensitive information, resulting in high impact on confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44756 | 2026-09-08 | 10 Critical | ||
| A memory safety vulnerability exists in the Extended Passport Protocol (EPP) processing library. Under specific conditions, an unauthenticated attacker could exploit a crafted network request containing a malformed EPP header, potentially resulting in undefined behavior and abnormal program termination. Successful exploitation may have a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66627 | 2 Edge22 Studios Ltd., Wordpress | 2 Gp Premium, Wordpress | 2026-09-07 | 9.9 Critical |
| Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in EDGE22 Studios Ltd. GP Premium allows Remote Code Inclusion. This issue affects GP Premium: from n/a through 2.5.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75650 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Magento Open Source | 2026-09-07 | 10 Critical |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82584 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Igniter | 2026-09-07 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences vulnerability in ash-project igniter allows a malicious package publisher to forge the mix igniter.install confirmation prompt. mix igniter.install prints a confirmation panel (an anti-typosquatting safeguard) listing a package's hex metadata before adding it. The panel builder in Igniter.Project.Deps wrote publisher-controlled fields (meta.description, owner usernames, requirement names, version) to the terminal with only newlines stripped. A malicious or typosquatted package can embed ANSI terminal escape sequences (cursor movement, line erase, carriage returns) in its metadata to overwrite the panel, forging trusted author names and download counts while concealing the real ones, so a developer relying on the panel to vet the package is deceived into approving a malicious dependency. This issue affects igniter: from 0.8.1 before 0.8.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82586 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Lua | 2026-09-07 | N/A |
| Improper Protection of Alternate Path vulnerability in ash-project ash_lua allows a user-supplied Lua script to read attributes that are not on the exposed-field allow-list. AshLua exposes Ash resources to Lua scripts, gated by a manifest declaring which fields are exposed. The read action's operation aggregate path in AshLua.Runtime took the field name straight from the Lua call and resolved it with only String.to_existing_atom and Ash.Query.Aggregate.new!, neither of which consults the exposed-field allow-list the normal fields path enforces. A script can therefore read the value of any attribute of any record the actor may read, including private sensitive?: true columns, via resource.read({ operation = {"list", "hashed_password"} }); min and max give a value oracle. Anyone able to submit or influence a Lua script can reach this. This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81638 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Double Entry | 2026-09-07 | N/A |
| Improper Handling of Alternate Encoding vulnerability in ash-project ash_double_entry allows an attacker to submit several distinct string spellings of the same identifier. AshDoubleEntry.ULID renders a 128-bit ULID as 26 Crockford base-32 characters, but the first character encodes only 3 bits, so canonical values are 0 to 7. decode/1 in lib/ulid.ex masks the first character to its low 3 bits and valid?/1 accepts all 32 characters in that position, so 0..., 8..., G... and R... decode to the identical 16-byte value and resolve to the same row. When the type is exposed as a public ID over an HTTP or API boundary, an attacker-supplied ID can be spelled differently from the record it actually reads or writes, desynchronizing or bypassing string-level checks such as idempotency and deduplication keys, deny-lists, audit correlation, or signatures computed over the submitted ID. This issue affects ash_double_entry: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.19. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82758 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Authentication Oauth2 Server | 2026-09-07 | N/A |
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in ash-project ash_authentication_oauth2_server allows an unauthenticated attacker to register OAuth clients even when Dynamic Client Registration is gated by an initial access token. resolve_secret/3 in AshAuthentication.Oauth2Server (reached through __resolve_secret__!) treated any return other than {:ok, _} or :error from a configured {module, function, args} or 2-arity-function secret provider as a valid secret, wrapping nil, false, or "" as {:ok, value}. When the initial_access_token resolves to such an empty value, POST /oauth/register compares the presented bearer token against it and the comparison passes with no token supplied, so registration is open although it was configured closed. The same fail-open affected other resolved secrets such as signing_secret. This issue affects ash_authentication_oauth2_server: from 0.1.0 before 0.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82757 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Authentication Oauth2 Server | 2026-09-07 | N/A |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ash-project ash_authentication_oauth2_server allows an attacker who controls a client metadata URL and its DNS to make the server connect to internal or loopback addresses. public_ip?/1 in AshAuthentication.Oauth2Server.CIMD.ReqFetcher enforces the outbound policy for CIMD metadata fetches. It classified several address forms as publicly routable that are not: IPv4-compatible ::/96 (for example ::127.0.0.1), SIIT IPv4-translated ::ffff:0:0:0/96, and deprecated site-local fec0::/10. A returned AAAA record in one of these ranges passed the policy, so a fetch pinned to that address reached space the policy was meant to block. This issue affects ash_authentication_oauth2_server: from 0.3.0 before 0.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82756 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Authentication Oauth2 Server | 2026-09-07 | N/A |
| Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output vulnerability in ash-project ash_authentication_oauth2_server allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary authentication parameters into the WWW-Authenticate challenge header. BearerPlug and RequireScopePlug built the Bearer resource_metadata="..." challenge by interpolating a resource_metadata URL derived from the request tenant directly into the quoted value. In a multi-tenant application that sets the Ash tenant from request-controlled data (a subdomain, the Host, a path segment, or a header), a tenant containing a " closes the quoted value and appends attacker-chosen auth-params, including a second resource_metadata URL pointing at an attacker-controlled authorization server that spec-following clients follow. Carriage returns and line feeds are rejected by Plug, so this is parameter injection within one header, not response splitting. This issue affects ash_authentication_oauth2_server: from 0.1.3 before 0.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82755 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Authentication Oauth2 Server | 2026-09-07 | N/A |
| Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_authentication_oauth2_server allows a shared HTTP cache to serve one tenant's OAuth discovery metadata to another tenant's clients. The RFC 8414 and RFC 9728 metadata endpoints in AshAuthentication.Phoenix.Oauth2Server.ProtocolRouter return tenant-specific values (issuer, authorization_endpoint, token_endpoint, jwks_uri) when a tenant is set, but sent them with Cache-Control: public, max-age=3600 and no Vary. When the tenant is derived from something other than the URL (a header or the Host) and a shared cache sits in front, the cache key is the URL alone, so a stored response for one tenant is served to another for up to an hour. Affected clients may then send authorization codes and secrets to the wrong tenant's token endpoint and validate tokens against the wrong keys. This issue affects ash_authentication_oauth2_server: from 0.1.3 before 0.3.1. | ||||