Export limit exceeded: 424123 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (30128 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-46769 | 1 Amd | 96 Epyc 7232p, Epyc 7232p Firmware, Epyc 7252 and 93 more | 2026-06-17 | 8.8 High |
| Insufficient syscall input validation in the ASP Bootloader may allow a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary DMA copies, which can lead to code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44411 | 1 Reolink | 2 Rlc-410w, Rlc-410w Firmware | 2026-06-17 | 7.7 High |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a reboot. Search param is not object. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44410 | 1 Reolink | 2 Rlc-410w, Rlc-410w Firmware | 2026-06-17 | 7.7 High |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in the cgiserver.cgi JSON command parser functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a reboot. UpgradePrepare param is not object. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43937 | 1 Smartptt | 1 Scada Server | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 High |
| Elcomplus SmartPTT SCADA Server web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43850 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 Medium |
| Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. In affected versions admins users can trigger a Denial of Service attack via the `/message-bus/_diagnostics` path. The impact of this vulnerability is greater on multisite Discourse instances (where multiple forums are served from a single application server) where any admin user on any of the forums are able to visit the `/message-bus/_diagnostics` path. The problem has been patched. Please upgrade to 2.8.0.beta10 or 2.7.12. No workarounds for this issue exist. | ||||
| CVE-2021-39190 | 1 Teclib-edition | 1 System Center Configuration Manager | 2026-06-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| The SCCM plugin for GLPI is a plugin to synchronize computers from SCCM (version 1802) to GLPI. In versions prior to 2.3.0, the Configuration page is publicly accessible in read-only mode. This issue is patched in version 2.3.0. No known workarounds exist. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22767 | 1 Schneider-electric | 4 Powerlogic Egx100, Powerlogic Egx100 Firmware, Powerlogic Egx300 and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.8 Critical |
| A CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists in PowerLogic EGX100 (Versions 3.0.0 and newer) and PowerLogic EGX300 (All Versions) that could cause denial of service or remote code execution via a specially crafted HTTP packet.This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-2276 | ||||
| CVE-2021-21085 | 1 Adobe | 1 Connect | 2026-06-17 | 7.8 High |
| Adobe Connect version 11.0.7 (and earlier) is affected by an Input Validation vulnerability in the export feature. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting a payload into an online event form and achieve code execution if the victim exports and opens the data on their local machine. | ||||
| CVE-2021-0183 | 1 Intel | 44 Amt Ac 8260, Amt Ac 8260 Firmware, Amt Ac 8265 and 41 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input in software for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and some Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3477 | 1 Cisco | 9 2610xm, 2611xm, 2612 and 6 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the CLI parser of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to access files from the flash: filesystem. The vulnerability is due to insufficient application of restrictions during the execution of a specific command. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a specific command at the command line. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain read-only access to files that are located on the flash: filesystem that otherwise might not have been accessible. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36532 | 1 Klapp | 1 App | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Klapp App and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Authorization. The manipulation leads to information disclosure (Credentials). The attack can be initiated remotely. It is recommended to upgrade the affected app. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1918 | 1 Cisco | 2 Carrier Routing System, Ios Xr | 2026-06-17 | 7.4 High |
| A vulnerability in the implementation of Intermediate System–to–Intermediate System (IS–IS) routing protocol functionality in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated attacker who is in the same IS-IS area to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to incorrect processing of IS–IS link-state protocol data units (PDUs). An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending specific link-state PDUs to an affected system to be processed. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause incorrect calculations used in the weighted remote shared risk link groups (SRLG) or in the IGP Flexible Algorithm. It could also cause tracebacks to the logs or potentially cause the receiving device to crash the IS–IS process, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1843 | 1 Cisco | 6 Rv110w, Rv110w Firmware, Rv130w and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the Cisco RV110W Wireless-N VPN Firewall, Cisco RV130W Wireless-N Multifunction VPN Router, and Cisco RV215W Wireless-N VPN Router could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied data in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious HTTP requests to a targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to reload the device and causing a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54421 | 1 Openstack | 1 Ironic | 2026-06-16 | 6.8 Medium |
| In OpenStack Ironic before 37.0.1, when applying a PATCH to update fields in volume properties the user is authorized for, Ironic can return unredacted sensitive information (such as iSCSI credentials). The PATCH outcome is a security issue; the POST outcome is not a security issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46001 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-16 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hwmon: (pt5161l) Fix bugs in pt5161l_read_block_data() Fix two bugs in pt5161l_read_block_data(): 1. Buffer overrun: The local buffer rbuf is declared as u8 rbuf[24], but i2c_smbus_read_block_data() can return up to I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX (32) bytes. The i2c-core copies the data into the caller's buffer before the return value can be checked, so the post-read length validation does not prevent a stack overrun if a device returns more than 24 bytes. Resize the buffer to I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX. 2. Unexpected positive return on length mismatch: When all three retries are exhausted because the device returns data with an unexpected length, i2c_smbus_read_block_data() returns a positive byte count. The function returns this directly, and callers treat any non-negative return as success, processing stale or incomplete buffer contents. Return -EIO when retries are exhausted with a positive return value, preserving the negative error code on I2C failure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42384 | 2 Nsquared, Wordpress | 2 Simply Schedule Appointments, Wordpress | 2026-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Simply Schedule Appointments < 1.6.11.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39480 | 2 Inisev, Wordpress | 2 Backup Migration, Wordpress | 2026-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Backup Migration <= 2.1.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42667 | 2 Bookly, Wordpress | 2 Bookly, Wordpress | 2026-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Bookly <= 27.4 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48965 | 2 Watchful, Wordpress | 2 Xcloner, Wordpress | 2026-06-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| Subscriber Sensitive Data Exposure in XCloner <= 4.8.6 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42768 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-06-16 | 3.7 Low |
| Issue summary: The CMS_decrypt and PKCS7_decrypt functions are vulnerable to Bleichenbacher-style attack when an attacker is able to provide the CMS or S/MIME messages and observe the error code and/or decryption output. Impact summary: The Bleichenbacher-style attack allows an attacker to use the victim's vulnerable application as a way to decrypt or sign messages with the victim's private RSA key. The attack is possible in 2 variants. 1. The decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is used without providing the recipient certificate. In this case OpenSSL iterates over every KeyTransRecipientInfo (KTRI) without stopping at the first success. An attacker who authors a message with two KTRI entries — the first one wrapping a real CEK under the victim's public key, the second with an arbitrary probe ciphertext — obtains opportunity to iterate the 2nd KTRI to get a valid PKCS#1 v1.5 padding if the error code of the application is available. That is a Bleichenbacher oracle (Bleichenbacher, CRYPTO '98): an adaptive-chosen-ciphertext side channel from which the attacker decrypts any RSA ciphertext to the victim's key or forges any PKCS#1 v1.5 signature under it. 2. When the decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is provided with the recipient certificate, and the recipient is not found, a random key is substituted. An attacker who authors a message and is able to compare both error code and the result of the decryption, can mount a Bleichenbacher oracle. We are not aware of any applications that provide a remote attacker an opportunity to mount an attack described in these scenarios. We consider the existence of such application very unlikely, and for this reason this CVE has been evaluated as Low severity. To avoid these attacks, when RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 Key Transport is in use, the invoked EVP_PKEY_decrypt() will use the implicit rejection mechanism described in draft-irtf-cfrg-rsa-guidance. In previous OpenSSL releases the implicit rejection was explicitly disabled. The implicit rejection mechanism always returns a plaintext value, the symmetric key. This result is deterministic for the ciphertext and the private key. The length of the decryption result can happen to match the length of the key of the symmetric cipher that was used for the content encryption. When a certificate is not provided, the last RecipientInfo producing a key that looks valid will be used. It may cause getting garbage content on decryption. As a proper way to deal with this a recipient certificate has to be provided to identify the particular RecipientInfo for decryption. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 are not affected by this issue, as CMS and S/MIME processing happens outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||