Export limit exceeded: 390037 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11541 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3130 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 5.6.0, 5.4.4 and below versions allows attacker to get FortiOS version info by inspecting FortiOS IKE VendorID packets. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3115 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader 2017.009.20058 and earlier, 2017.008.30051 and earlier, 2015.006.30306 and earlier, and 11.0.20 and earlier has an information disclosure vulnerability when handling links in a PDF document. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2565 | 1 Samsung | 2 Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Samsung SecEmailSync on SM-G920F build G920FXXU2COH2 (Galaxy S6) devices allows attackers to read sent e-mail messages, aka SVE-2015-5081. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3111 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Experience Manager 6.3, 6.2, 6.1, 6.0. Sensitive tokens are included in http GET requests under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6347 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| The ip_cmsg_recv_checksum function in net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c in the Linux kernel before 4.10.1 has incorrect expectations about skb data layout, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted system calls, as demonstrated by use of the MSG_MORE flag in conjunction with loopback UDP transmission. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5672 | 1 Kony | 1 Enterprise Mobile Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Kony Enterprise Mobile Management (EMM) before 4.2.5.2 has the vulnerability of disclosing the private key in clear-text when changing the parameters of the request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5190 | 1 Netiq | 1 Access Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| NetIQ Access Manager 4.2 before SP3 HF1 and 4.3 before SP1 HF1, when configured as a SAML 2.0 Identity Server with Virtual Attributes, has a concurrency issue causing information leakage, related to a stale profile. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2326 | 1 Juniper | 1 Northstar Controller | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in Juniper Networks NorthStar Controller Application prior to version 2.1.0 Service Pack 1 may allow an unprivileged, authenticated, network-based attacker to replicate the underlying Junos OS VM and all data it maintains to their local system for future analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5075 | 5 Apple, Google, Linux and 2 more | 9 Macos, Android, Chrome and 6 more | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in CSP reporting in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to obtain the value of url fragments via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2320 | 1 Juniper | 1 Northstar Controller | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in Juniper Networks NorthStar Controller Application prior to version 2.1.0 Service Pack 1 may allow an unauthenticated, unprivileged, network-based attacker to cause various denials of services leading to targeted information disclosure, modification of any component of the NorthStar system, including managed systems, and full denial of services to any systems under management which NorthStar interacts with using read-only or read-write credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5011 | 2 Google, Redhat | 2 Chrome, Rhel Extras | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Google Chrome prior to 56.0.2924.76 for Windows insufficiently sanitized DevTools URLs, which allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to read filesystem contents via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2309 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos Space | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| On Juniper Networks Junos Space versions prior to 16.1R1 when certificate based authentication is enabled for the Junos Space cluster, some restricted web services are accessible over the network. This represents an information leak risk. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2294 | 1 Puppet | 1 Puppet Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Versions of Puppet Enterprise prior to 2016.4.5 or 2017.2.1 failed to mark MCollective server private keys as sensitive (a feature added in Puppet 4.6), so key values could be logged and stored in PuppetDB. These releases use the sensitive data type to ensure this won't happen anymore. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4966 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2103 | 1 K-opticom Corporation | 1 Lala Call | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The LaLa Call App for Android 2.4.7 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3738 | 4 Debian, Nodejs, Openssl and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Openssl and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3764 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Xclarity Administrator | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was identified in Lenovo XClarity Administrator (LXCA) before 1.4.0 where LXCA user account names may be exposed to unauthenticated users with access to the LXCA web user interface. No password information of the user accounts is exposed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3732 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 5 Node.js, Openssl, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3743 | 1 Lenovo | 3 Advanced Settings Utility, Toolscenter Dynamic System Analysis, Updatexpress System Pack Installer | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| If multiple users are concurrently logged into a single system where one user is sending a command via the Lenovo ToolsCenter Advanced Settings Utility (ASU), UpdateXpress System Pack Installer (UXSPI) or Dynamic System Analysis (DSA) to a second machine, the other users may be able to see the user ID and clear text password that were used to access the second machine during the time the command is processing. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3296 | 1 Oracle | 1 Commerce Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Platform component of Oracle Commerce (subcomponent: Dynamo Application Framework). Supported versions that are affected are 10.0.3.5, 10.2.0.5 and 11.2.0.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Commerce Platform. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Commerce Platform accessible data. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). | ||||