| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Pricing Table plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform a variety of actions related to managing pricing tables via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The web application is not protected against cross-site request forgery attacks. Therefore, an attacker can trick users into performing actions on the application when they visit an attacker-controlled website or click on a malicious link. E.g. an attacker can forge malicious links to reset the admin password or create new users. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lim Kai Yang Grab & Save.This issue affects Grab & Save: from n/a through 1.0.4. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Planet IGS-4215-16T2S, affecting firmware version 1.305b210528. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to trick some authenticated users into performing actions in their session, such as adding or updating accounts through the Switch web interface. |
| The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The 404 Error Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the updatePluginSettings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make changes to plugin settings and clear up all the error logs via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web interface of AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices. An attacker can craft malicious requests that, when executed in the context of an authenticated user’s browser session, allow unauthorized changes to the device configuration without user interaction. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Socomec Net Vision, version 7.20. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick registered users into performing critical actions, such as adding and updating accounts, due to lack of proper sanitisation of the ‘set_param.cgi’ file. |
| An SSRF issue in the PDFMyURL service allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via a POST request in the url parameter |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1761813675 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 16.13-5 and 16.12-8 don't have cross-site request forgery protection in the management of SVN commit rules and immutable tags. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1761813675, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-5, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-8 contain a fix for the issue. |
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." |
| Wimi Teamwork versions prior to 7.38.17 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in its API. The API accepts any authenticated request that contains a JSON field named 'csrf_token' without validating the field’s value; only the presence of the field is checked. An attacker can craft a cross-site request that causes a logged-in victim’s browser to submit a JSON POST containing an arbitrary or empty 'csrf_token', and the API will execute the request with the victim’s privileges. Successful exploitation can allow an attacker to perform privileged actions as the victim potentially resulting in account takeover, privilege escalation, or service disruption. |
| The WP User Profile Avatar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpupa_user_admin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins setting which controls access to the functionality via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Friendly Functions for Welcart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpcf7cf_admin_init function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| SOCA Access Control System 180612 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit forged requests to create admin accounts by tricking logged-in users into visiting a malicious site. |
| Synaccess netBooter NP-0801DU 7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages with hidden form submissions to add admin users by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a malicious page. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPENGINE, INC. Advanced Custom Fields PRO.This issue affects Advanced Custom Fields PRO: from n/a before 6.3.2. |
| The Kademlia DHT (go-libp2p-kad-dht 0.20.0 and earlier) used in IPFS (0.18.1 and earlier) assigns routing information for content (i.e., information about who holds the content) to be stored by peers whose peer IDs have a small DHT distance from the content ID. This allows an attacker to censor content by generating many Sybil peers whose peer IDs have a small distance from the content ID, thus hijacking the content resolution process. |
| Due to insufficient CSRF protection in SAP Fiori App Manage Work Center Groups, an authenticated user could be tricked by an attacker to send unintended request to the web server. This has low impact on integrity and no impact on confidentiality and availability of the application. |
