Export limit exceeded: 387392 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9667 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-9661 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the delete_and_edit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imported content (posts, comments, users, etc.) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1358 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Pix Software Vivaz 6.0.10. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7501 | 2026-04-15 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| The Download Plugins and Themes in ZIP from Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the download_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to download arbitrary themes from the website via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. In versions prior to 1.8.6 it was possible to download the entire sites files. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13970 | 1 Openplcproject | 1 Openplc V3 | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| OpenPLC_V3 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack due to the absence of proper CSRF validation. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a maliciously crafted link, potentially enabling unauthorized modification of PLC settings or the upload of malicious programs which could lead to significant disruption or damage to connected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14266 | 1 Ercom | 1 Cryptobox | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| CSRF in Ercom Cryptobox administration console allows attacker to trigger some actions on behalf of a Cryptobox administrator. The attack requires the administrator to browse a malicious web site or to click a link while he has an open session on the administration console. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7422 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Theme My Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the tml_admin_save_ms_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the theme's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Please note that this only affects multi-site instances. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59901 | 1 Flexense | 2 Disk Pulse Enterprise, Sync Breeze Enterprise Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker could exploit this weakness to send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29050 | 1 Liferay | 2 Dxp, Portal | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the terms of use page in Liferay Portal before 7.3.6, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before service pack 1, 7.2 before fix pack 11 allows remote attackers to accept the site's terms of use via social engineering and enticing the user to visit a malicious page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7141 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Versions of Gliffy Online prior to versions 4.14.0-7 contains a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) flaw. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6001 | 1 Virtuemart | 1 Virtuemart | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the product image upload function of VirtueMart that bypasses the CSRF protection token. An attacker is able to craft a special CSRF request which will allow unrestricted file upload into the VirtueMart media manager. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56311 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In Shenzhen C-Data Technology Co. FD602GW-DX-R410 (firmware v2.2.14), the web management interface contains an authenticated CSRF vulnerability on the reboot endpoint (/boaform/admin/formReboot). An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated administrator, causes the router to reboot without explicit user consent. This lack of CSRF protection on a sensitive administrative function can lead to denial of service by disrupting network availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12373 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25359 | 1 Sitzungsdienst | 1 Sd.net Rim | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| SD.NET RIM versions before 4.7.3c contain a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL statements through POST parameters 'idtyp' and 'idgremium'. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting specially formed POST requests to the /vorlagen/ endpoint, enabling unauthorized database manipulation and potential information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5988 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) origin checking is not done on requests from the gateway to external components, such as the controller, hub, and eda. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59845 | 1 Apollographql | 2 Apollo Explorer, Apollo Sandbox | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54390 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the ResetPasswordRequest operation of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) when the zimbraFeatureResetPasswordStatus attribute is enabled. An attacker can exploit this by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a malicious webpage that silently sends a crafted SOAP request to reset the user's password. The vulnerability stems from a lack of CSRF token validation on the endpoint, allowing password resets without the user's consent. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52463 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Active! mail 6 BuildInfo: 6.60.06008562 and earlier. If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended E-mail may be sent when a user accesses a specially crafted URL while being logged in. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31328 | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| SAP Learning Solution is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), allowing an attacker to trick authenticated user into sending unintended requests to the server. GET-based OData function is named in a way that it violates the expected behaviour. This issue could impact both the confidentiality and integrity of the application without affecting the availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64117 | 1 Enalean | 1 Tuleap | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1761813675 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 16.13-5 and 16.12-8 don't have cross-site request forgery protection in the management of SVN commit rules and immutable tags. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1761813675, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-5, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-8 contain a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64700 | 1 Growi | 1 Growi | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GROWI v7.3.3 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, the user may be tricked to do unintended operations. | ||||