Export limit exceeded: 425799 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (425799 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-94407 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.11 is potentially vulnerable to denial of service due to uncontrolled regular expression complexity (CWE-400 / ReDoS). An authenticated user with tool-registration privileges can embed catastrophically backtracking regex patterns in a tool's JSON Schema `pattern` field; when ContextForge validates arguments against that schema, the validation call may consume unbounded CPU, potentially degrading gateway availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110189 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.8 through 1.0.11, and v1.1.0 is vulnerable to denial of service due to an incomplete denylist in the jq filter guard module (CWE-184). An authenticated remote attacker can supply a crafted `jsonpath_filter` value containing `halt`, `halt_error`, or unbounded-loop built-ins that bypass the safety check, causing gateway worker process termination or sustained resource exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110195 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.11 could allow an authenticated caller to bypass upstream credential-level authorization policies due to an insufficiently specific cache key in the RFC 8693 token exchange cache, enabling reuse of cached upstream bearer tokens across different credentials belonging to the same user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110278 | 1 Ibm | 1 Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-13 | 7.4 High |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow an attacker to replay identity propagation claims signatures or expose sensitive user identity information to third-party MCP servers due to static signature payloads and missing per-gateway configuration checks during tool invocation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-128886 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-11-13 | 6.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in dbus when configured with the nonce-tcp transport. An unauthenticated attacker able to connect to an exposed listener can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by opening a connection and withholding the expected authentication token. Because the server processes this verification without enforcing a timeout, the stalled connection blocks the accept process and prevents legitimate clients from establishing new connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97683 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 2.5 Low |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow a local attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a missing or misconfigured security context. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9870 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108290 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 4 Medium |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow an attacker with local access to a container to extract sensitive information due to unrestrictive network policies. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9821 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cyber Fraud | 2026-11-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow an unauthorized user to inject data into log messages due to improper neutralization of special elements when written to log files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57013 | 2026-11-13 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In access_control_enable of multiple files, there is a possible way to release secure coprocessors from reset via unclaimed firewall registers due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58702 | 2026-11-13 | 4.0 Medium | ||
| In createIntent of TimerAgent.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58705 | 2026-11-13 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| In handleEvent of gscan.cpp, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write on the heap due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58757 | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High | ||
| In mfc_alloc_enc_roi_buffer of mfc_buf.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58762 | 2026-11-13 | 2.3 Low | ||
| In ac_get_prot_config of plat_trusty.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58769 | 2026-11-13 | 2.3 Low | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58778 | 2026-11-13 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58779 | 2026-11-13 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58780 | 2026-11-13 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58785 | 2026-11-13 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In update_user_consent of main.rs, there is a possible elevation of privilege due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58786 | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High | ||
| In cnm_memset of hevc_decoder, there is a possible Non-Heap Buffer Overflow due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||