Export limit exceeded: 389924 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389924 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-53769 | 1 Avo Hq | 1 Avo | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Avo is a framework to create admin panels for Ruby on Rails apps. From version 2.28.0 to before version 3.32.0, Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks server-side upload authorization and bypasses the documented field-level upload policy methods such as upload_{FIELD_ID}?. An authenticated Avo user who can reach the Avo attachment upload endpoint can replace or add attachment content, including binary content, filename, and content-type metadata, on a resolved record even when both update? and upload_<field>? policies deny the operation. This primarily affects multi-role Avo Pro/Advanced-style deployments where non-administrator or restricted operator users can reach Avo and per-record or per-field operations are expected to be enforced by policies. This issue has been patched in version 3.32.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53637 | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3174 | 2 Stellarwp, Wordpress | 2 Event Tickets And Registration, Wordpress | 2026-09-09 | 7.5 High |
| The Event Tickets and Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the Stripe OAuth return endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 5.27.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the site's Stripe merchant credentials (access tokens, publishable keys, and account ID), diverting all subsequent payment processing to the attacker's Stripe account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19855 | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The CleanTalk WordPress plugin before 6.87 does not prevent unauthenticated, user-supplied comment content from being passed to WordPress's shortcode engine, allowing any visitor to have arbitrary shortcodes registered on the site executed server-side and rendered to every subsequent visitor of the page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15667 | 2026-09-09 | 7.5 High | ||
| The Eventin – Event Calendar, Event Registration, Tickets & Booking (AI Powered) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Local File Inclusion in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.22 via the 'event_layout' parameter parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to include and execute arbitrary .php files on the server, allowing the execution of any PHP code in those files. This can be used to bypass access controls, obtain sensitive data, or achieve code execution in cases where .php file types can be uploaded and included. The etn_manage_event capability is assigned to Contributors by default, meaning any Contributor-level user can set the malicious event_layout value via the REST API without any additional configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14962 | 2026-09-09 | 8.6 High | ||
| The ELEX WooCommerce Request a Quote WordPress plugin before 2.4.1 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL query, allowing unauthenticated users to perform SQL injection attacks and extract arbitrary data from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64830 | 2026-09-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64584 | 2026-09-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15690 | 2026-09-09 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| The Content Mask WordPress plugin before 1.8.5.6 does not properly sanitise and escape content submitted with a post before outputting it in the pages it generates, allowing users with a role as low as Contributor to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against any user viewing or previewing the affected page. The Content Mask WordPress plugin before 1.8.5.6's option to restrict its use by role does not prevent this. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0289 | 2 Palo Alto Networks, Paloaltonetworks | 2 Prisma Browser, Prisma Browser | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| A security bypass vulnerability in the Account Protection feature of Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser enables a user to bypass intended security controls. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9355 | 1 Redhat | 23 Amq Streams, Ansible Automation Platform, Container Native Virtualization and 20 more | 2026-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Golang FIPS OpenSSL. This flaw allows a malicious user to randomly cause an uninitialized buffer length variable with a zeroed buffer to be returned in FIPS mode. It may also be possible to force a false positive match between non-equal hashes when comparing a trusted computed hmac sum to an untrusted input sum if an attacker can send a zeroed buffer in place of a pre-computed sum. It is also possible to force a derived key to be all zeros instead of an unpredictable value. This may have follow-on implications for the Go TLS stack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0290 | 2 Palo Alto Networks, Paloaltonetworks | 2 Prisma Browser, Prisma Browser | 2026-09-09 | 5.5 Medium |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in the Account Protection feature of Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser enables a local attacker to view sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17443 | 1 Ibm | 3 App Connect Enterprise, Integration Bus For Z\/os, Integration Bus For Zos | 2026-09-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.28 and IBM Integration Bus for z/OS 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.0.7 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17444 | 1 Ibm | 3 App Connect Enterprise, Integration Bus For Z\/os, Integration Bus For Zos | 2026-09-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.28 and IBM Integration Bus for z/OS 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.0.7 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14164 | 3 Libarchive, Red Hat, Redhat | 12 Libarchive, Enterprise Linux, Discovery and 9 more | 2026-09-09 | 7.5 High |
| A double free issue has been identified in libarchive's RAR5 reader. During parsing of a specially crafted RAR5 archive, the filtered_buf pointer may remain stale after being freed during unpacking state reinitialization. Subsequent processing of another archive entry can trigger a second free of the same memory region, resulting in a double-free condition. Successful exploitation may cause applications using the vulnerable libarchive API to terminate unexpectedly, leading to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56125 | 2026-09-09 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49947 | 2026-09-09 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43645 | 2026-09-09 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43635 | 2026-09-09 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34412 | 2026-09-09 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||